This is a breach of contract case. Appellant Homeowner contracted with Appellee for the installation of a “smart home” system. After myriad problems arose, Appellant fired Appellee, who filed the instant lawsuit to collect the unpaid balance for equipment and installation. The trial court determined that the primary purpose of the parties’ agreement was the sale of goods and applied Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code. The court granted judgment in favor of Appellee, but allowed certain offsets for items rejected by Appellant. Appellant appeals, arguing that the trial court erred in applying the UCC, and in its calculation of damages. Appellant also appeals the trial court’s determination that the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act does not apply. Discerning no error, we affirm.
Case Number
W2012-00216-COA-R3-CV
Originating Judge
Chancellor Kenny W. Armstrong
Case Name
Audio Visual Artistry v. Stephen Tanzer
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
No
Download PDF Version
audiovisualopn.pdf219.48 KB