Mother and Father were divorced in 2010, and Father filed a petition for modification of the parenting plan seven months later in an effort to reduce Mother’s parenting time. The trial courtdetermined Fatherdid notshow a materialchange of circumstances and denied Father’s petition. Father appealed,alleging the trial court erred in four different ways: (1) concluding Father had not proved a material change of circumstances; (2) precluding Father from introducing evidence of Mother’s mental health prior to the divorce; (3) allowing the parenting plan to stay intact such that Mother is able to return to court to prove her mental stability and seek an increase in her parenting time; and (4) not awarding Father his attorney’s fees. We affirm the trial court’s judgment in all respects.
Case Number
M2012-01049-COA-R3-CV
Originating Judge
Judge Ross H. Hicks
Case Name
Steve E. Dowlen v. Luana A. Dowlen
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
No
Download PDF Version
dowlense_opn.pdf95.07 KB