Ike J. White, III v. David A. Beeks, M.D. - Dissenting

Case Number
E2012-02443-COA-R3-CV

I respectfully dissent from the decision of the majority to affirm the Trial Court. I believe the Trial Court did commit reversible error when it limited Plaintiff’s medical expert’s testimony at trial regarding the standard of care in this health care liability informed consent action. Specifically, I do not believe that the Plaintiff’s expert’s testimony on what risks should have been disclosed to the Plaintiff to meet the acceptable standard of care for informed consent should have been limited to disclosure of only those risks that actually came to pass.

Authoring Judge
Judge D. Michael Swiney
Originating Judge
Judge J. Michael Sharp
Case Name
Ike J. White, III v. David A. Beeks, M.D. - Dissenting
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
This is a dissenting opinion
Download PDF Version