Andrew J. Braden, III v. Tennessee Board of Probation, et al. - Dissent

Case Number
M2013-02036-COA-R3-CV

I write separately to emphasize two troubling procedural issues with the majority Opinion. First, I am troubled by this Court’s analysis with regard to the timeliness of the filing of Mr. Braden’s petition for a writ of certiorari. Second, I disagree that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. For these reasons, I respectfully dissent.

Authoring Judge
Presiding Judge J. Steven Stafford
Originating Judge
Chancellor Carol L. McCoy
Case Name
Andrew J. Braden, III v. Tennessee Board of Probation, et al. - Dissent
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
This is a dissenting opinion
Download PDF Version