At issue in this appeal are several divorce and post-divorce matters. We conclude that we are without jurisdiction to adjudicate the issues related to the divorce litigation, as they were not timely appealed. With respect to the post-divorce matters, we conclude that the trial court properly exercised jurisdiction over Mother’s petition to modify the parties’ parenting schedule, that the evidence does not preponderate against its decision to modify the parenting schedule, and that it did not err in its refusal to find Father in civil contempt. Exercising our discretion, we decline to award Mother discretionary costs and attorney’s fees pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated § 27-1-122 or attorney’s fees pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated § 36-5-103(c).
Case Number
W2014-01071-COA-R3-CV
Originating Judge
Chancellor Walter L. Evans
Case Name
Soumya Pandey v. Manish Shrivastava
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
No
Download PDF Version
pandeysoumyaopn_0.pdf274.62 KB