Case Number
E2014-00865-COA-R3-CV
I concur in the majority’s opinion with the sole exception that I cannot agree with the majority that the amount of alimony in futuro awarded to Wife should be increased from $500 per month after eight years to $2,288. I agree with the majority that the transitional alimony must be changed to another type of alimony to comply with Tennessee law, and that the only other type that fits under the statutes is alimony in futuro. My only disagreement is with the majority’s sua sponte changing of the amount ordered by the trial court.
Originating Judge
Chancellor Jeffrey M. Atherton
Case Name
Andrew R. Lunn, DDS v. Carole Michelle Lunn - Concurring and Dissenting
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
No
Download PDF Version
lunn.concur-dissent.pdf79.29 KB