Frankie G. Munn v. Sandra M. Phillips Et Al. - Dissenting

Case Number
E2016-02242-COA-R3-CV

The majority holds that a remand to the trial court is necessary “[b]ecause the trial court failed to make specific findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding the applicability of any res judicata defense . . . .” (Italics in original.) I believe the record in this case clearly shows that the claim of the appellee Frankie G. Munn is barred by the doctrine of res judicata. Hence, I see no need for a remand.

Authoring Judge
Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Originating Judge
Judge Rex H. Ogle
Case Name
Frankie G. Munn v. Sandra M. Phillips Et Al. - Dissenting
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
This is a dissenting opinion