Appellants’ employee embezzled funds from Appellants using the employee’s Bank of America account. The employee wrote checks on Appellants’ accounts to legitimate third party vendors but deposited the checks into her own personal account by way of Bank of America’s ATMs. Appellants filed suit against Bank of America alleging that the bank’s failure to either prevent this activity or alert Appellants thereto constituted causes of action for aiding and abetting conversion, aiding and abetting fraud, civil conspiracy, and negligence. The trial court granted Bank of America’s motion to dismiss Appellants’ claims for aiding and abetting fraud and conversion and for civil conspiracy based on Bank of America’s lack of knowledge of Appellants’ employee’s wrongdoing. The court subsequently granted Bank of America’s motion for summary judgment on the remaining negligence claim finding that the bank owed no duty to Appellants. We affirm.
Case Number
M2017-00965-COA-R3-CV
Originating Judge
Chancellor Russell T. Perkins
Case Name
Mark IV Enterprises, Inc., Et Al. v. Bank Of America, N.A., Et Al.
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
No
Download PDF Version
markivv.bkofamerica.opn_.pdf144.32 KB