Audra Snapp Olinger v. Travis Jackson Olinger - Concurring and Dissenting

Case Number
E2017-02133-COA-R3-CV
D. MICHAEL SWINEY, C.J., concurring and dissenting.
I concur with the majority in its affirmance of that portion of the Trial Court’s award to Wife which can be classified distinctly as discretionary costs pursuant to Tenn. R. Civ. P. 54.04.1 Wife was granted a divorce based upon Husband’s stipulated adultery and inappropriate marital conduct. To that extent, Wife prevailed, and I agree with the majority that the Trial Court did not abuse its discretion in granting her an award of discretionary costs in the amount of $2,270.
 
Authoring Judge
Judge D. Michael Swiney, Chief Judge
Originating Judge
Judge J. Michael Sharp
Case Name
Audra Snapp Olinger v. Travis Jackson Olinger - Concurring and Dissenting
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
This is a dissenting opinion
Download PDF Version