United Supreme Council AASR SJ, et al v. Fredrick McWilliams, et al

Case Number
W2018-00116-COA-R3-CV

This appeal concerns a derivative action brought on behalf of a non-profit corporation. Citing alleged embezzlement and misappropriation of funds by the directors, plaintiffs, members of the non-profit at the time of filing, brought a derivative action on behalf of the fraternal and charitable organization. After filing the derivative suit, plaintiffs established and became members of a competing organization. Pursuant to the original organization’s constitution, this caused the plaintiffs to surrender all their membership rights in the original organization. Defendants moved for summary judgment based on plaintiffs’ lack of standing to maintain the derivative action pursuant to Tennessee Rule of Civil Procedure 23.06. The trial court granted the motion, dismissing all of plaintiffs’ claims against defendants, holding that plaintiffs could not fairly and adequately represent the interest of the organization’s remaining members because they themselves were no longer members and because of the conflict of interest inherent in their establishment of the competing organization. We affirm.

Authoring Judge
Judge Arnold B. Goldin
Originating Judge
Chancellor Jim Kyle
Case Name
United Supreme Council AASR SJ, et al v. Fredrick McWilliams, et al
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
No
Download PDF Version