In Re Melvin M. et al.

A father appeals the termination of his parental rights to his two children. The juvenile

court concluded that there was clear and convincing evidence of five statutory grounds for

terminating his parental rights. The court also concluded that there was clear and

convincing evidence that termination of the father’s parental rights was in the children’s

best interest. On appeal, although we conclude that there is not clear and convincing

evidence to support three of the grounds, clear and convincing evidence supports the

remaining grounds for termination and the best interest determination. So we affirm.