Michelle Lynn Durham and husband, Robert Wayne Durham, v. Luther Well an wife, Sue Well, individually and D/B/A Webb's British Petroleum Station and W. Paul Arnold, individually and D/B/A Arnold Construction Co.
Michelle Lynn Durham and Robert Wayne Durham (“plaintiffs” or by name)1 brought this suit in the Circuit Court of Gibson, County against Luther Webb and wife Sue Webb, individually and d/b/a Webb’s British Petroleum Station (“defendants”),2 seeking damages for defendant’s alleged negligence that caused plaintiff Michelle Durham to fall in defendant’s parking lot, causing injuries. The trial court granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment, from which this appeal is taken. The sole issue presented is whether the trial court erred in granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment. We find no error and affirm. |
Gibson | Court of Appeals | |
Lillian D. Vega-Horta, et al., v. Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Company, et al.
Plaintiff, Lillian Vega-Horta (“plaintiff”), appeals the judgment of the trial court granting defendant’s, St. Mary’s Medical Center (“St. Mary’s”) Motion for Summary Judgment. For reasons state hereinafter, we affirm the trial court’s judgment. |
Knox | Court of Appeals | |
02A01-9411-CV-00255
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
02A01-9412-CV-00269
|
Madison | Court of Appeals | |
02A01-9412-CV-00269
|
Madison | Court of Appeals | |
02A01-9410-CH-00232
|
Dyer | Court of Appeals | |
01A01-9505-CH-00218
|
Court of Appeals | ||
01A01-9512-CH-00562
|
Warren | Court of Appeals | |
Vicky v. Klein
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
The Recent Case of Gene v. Aaby v. Judy Aaby Strange, ____S.W.2D____,
|
Bradley | Court of Appeals | |
Ester v. Hayes And
|
Court of Appeals | ||
03A01-9601-CH-00033
|
Court of Appeals | ||
03A01-9512-CV-00448
|
Court of Appeals | ||
03A01-9601-CV-00003
|
Court of Appeals | ||
02A01-9411-CH-00261
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
02A01-9411-CH-00262
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
02A01-9511-CH-00258
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
03A01-9507-JV-00211
|
Bradley | Court of Appeals | |
Martin H. Aussenberg, v. Bruce S. Kramer, David J. Cocke, and Borod and Kramer
In this case, Plaintiff, Martin H. Aussenberg (“Aussenberg”), appeals the trial court’s valuation of his former partnership’s work-in-progress and accounts receivable as well as its finding regarding Aussenberg’s interest in the partnership’s accounts receivable and work-inprogress. We affirm the decision of the trial court. |
Court of Appeals | ||
03A01-9509-CV-00312
|
Greene | Court of Appeals | |
03A01-9511-CH-00388
|
Hamilton | Court of Appeals | |
01A01-9512-CH-00543
|
Macon | Court of Appeals | |
01A01-9512-CH-00572
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
01A01-9601-CV-00020
|
Sumner | Court of Appeals | |
01A01-9510-CH-00489
|
Court of Appeals |