State of Tennessee v. Thomas Dee Huskey - Dissenting

Case Number
2002-00030-CCA-R10-CD

As acknowledged by the majority in its carefully considered opinion, trial judges are vested with broad discretionary powers in the conduct of a trial. Courts must monitor all attorney conduct and may direct a remedy if the performance impedes the orderly administration of justice. United States v. Dinitz, 538 F. 2d 1214, 1219 (5th Cir. 1976). That authority necessarily includes the supervision of appointed counsel for indigent defendants. Moncier v. Ferrell, 990 S.W.2d 710
(Tenn. 1998). An extraordinary appeal to this court on any issue relative to the supervision of the trial which requires immediate appellate review may be granted only in limited circumstances: (1) when the trial court has so far departed from the accepted and usual course of judicial proceedings as to require intervention; or (2) if necessary for a complete determination of the case. Tenn. R. App. P. 10.

Authoring Judge
Presiding Judge Gary R. Wade
Originating Judge
Judge Richard R. Baumgartner
Case Name
State of Tennessee v. Thomas Dee Huskey - Dissenting
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
This is a dissenting opinion
Download PDF Version