I write separately to explain why I am concurring in results only in this case. The record reflects that Defendant’s counsel adamantly asserted that aggravated assault was a lesser-included offense of attempted first degree murder. Just as adamantly, the State argued that aggravated assault was not a lesser-included offense of attempted first degree murder under our supreme court’s decision in State v. Burns, 6 S.W.3d 453 (Tenn. 1999). The record also reflects that while the trial court had reservations about the appropriateness of charging aggravated assault as a lesser-included offense, it was ultimately persuaded to do so by arguments of Defendant’s counsel. Counsel’s conduct may or may not be grounds for relief to Defendant in a post-conviction proceeding, but that must be decided at a later hearing on a later date.
Case Number
M2002-01603-CCA-R3-CD
Originating Judge
Judge Jane W. Wheatcraft
Case Name
State of Tennessee v. Alonzo Maurice Rogan - Concurring
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
This is a dissenting opinion
Download PDF Version
RoganC.pdf9.44 KB