Eddie Howard Pittman v. State of Tennessee - Dissenting

Case Number
W2002-02892-CCA-R3-PC

Although I agree with many of the conclusions set forth in the majority opinion, I respectfully disagree with its primary conclusion that the petitioner did not establish ineffective assistance of counsel. In my view, he established deficiency and prejudice. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687, 104 S. Ct. 2052, 80 L. Ed. 2d 674 (1984).

Authoring Judge
Judge Joe G. Riley
Originating Judge
Judge Roger A. Page
Case Name
Eddie Howard Pittman v. State of Tennessee - Dissenting
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
This is a dissenting opinion
Download PDF Version