State of Tennessee v. Ricky Grover Aaron - Concurring

Case Number
M2002-02288-CCA-R3-CD

I concur with Judge Smith’s lead opinion; however, I am writing separately for two reasons.  First, I have reconsidered, and upon further reflection, retreat from my earlier position that sentences found to be in violation of Blakely should be remanded for a new sentencing hearing in the trial court. Until such time as there is clear authority for our courts to deal with Blakely issues, whether by case law or by statute, judicial economy and sentencing considerations, including uniformity of application of sentencing factors, dictates that most sentences found to be in violation of Blakely should be modified, if at all, by the appellate courts. Clearly, the appellate courts have been given the authority to do so by the legislature Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-35-401(c).

Authoring Judge
Judge Thomas T. Woodall
Originating Judge
Judge Walter C. Kurtz
Case Name
State of Tennessee v. Ricky Grover Aaron - Concurring
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
No
Download PDF Version
aaronrC.pdf23.45 KB