Dickey L. Cotton v. David Mills, Warden - Dissenting

Case Number
W2004-02523-CCA-R3-HC

I agree that if the allegations and assertions contained in the petition are correct, the Defendant’s sentences appear to be in direct contravention to Tennessee’s sentencing act and are therefore illegal and void. However, because the Defendant’s habeas corpus petition was summarily dismissed without a hearing, I would remand the case to the habeas court for a determination of whether the sentences are indeed void.

Authoring Judge
Judge David H. Welles
Originating Judge
Judge David H. Welles
Case Name
Dickey L. Cotton v. David Mills, Warden - Dissenting
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
This is a dissenting opinion
Download PDF Version