Case Number
W2008-00102-CCA-R3-PC
The petitioner, Curtis Palmer, appeals the post-conviction court’s denial of his petition for post-conviction relief. On appeal, he argues that he received the ineffective assistance of counsel. Specifically, he argues that his trial counsel was ineffective as follows: (1) counsel admitted the petitioner’s guilt during the trial without the petitioner’s consent; (2) counsel failed to adequately investigate possible grounds for a speedy trial; (3) counsel failed to challenge invalid indictments; and (4) counsel failed to properly litigate the suppression of evidence. After a thorough review of the record and the parties’ briefs, the judgment of the post-conviction court denying post-conviction
relief is affirmed.
Originating Judge
Judge James M. Lammey, Jr.
Case Name
Curtis Palmer v. State of Tennessee
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
No
Download PDF Version
PalmerCurtisOPN.pdf93.28 KB