State of Tennessee v. Michael Shane Springer - Concurring In Part and Dissenting In Part

Case Number
W2010-02153-CCA-R3-CD

I agree with the portion of the lead opinion by Judge Bivins which holds that Defendant is not entitled to relief pursuant to Article III of the IAD. I also agree and concur with the section of the lead opinion headed “Other Arguments.” I disagree with and therefore dissent from the remaining part of the lead opinion, which addresses Defendant’s claim pursuant to Article IV of the IAD.

Authoring Judge
Judge Thomas T. Woodall
Originating Judge
Judge Clayburn Peeples
Case Name
State of Tennessee v. Michael Shane Springer - Concurring In Part and Dissenting In Part
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
No
Download PDF Version