State of Tennessee v. Derishon Wadlington-Dissenting

Case Number
W2013-02521-CCA-R3-CD

I respectfully dissent. First, I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that the trial judge determined that the officers lacked probable cause to arrest Defendant. The majority quoted the trial court’s ruling, which I interpret bases the decision on the fact that the officers took Defendant into custodial arrest in violation of a statute that mandated the issuance of a citation in lieu of custodial arrest. The trial court’s reasoning was that since custodial arrest was invalid, the resulting search was invalid, and thus all evidence found in Defendant’s purse must be suppressed.

Authoring Judge
Presiding Judge Thomas T. Woodall
Originating Judge
Judge William B. Acree, Jr.
Case Name
State of Tennessee v. Derishon Wadlington-Dissenting
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
This is a dissenting opinion
Download PDF Version