State of Tennessee v. Marvin M. Green

Before the court is the pro se Defendant’s “Application for Extraordinary Relief.” See Tenn. R. App. P. 10. The Defendant raises two issues for this court’s review:
1. Whether Unicoi County Court(s) are moving [in] clear absen[ce] of jurisdiction?
2. Whether Unicoi County Court err[ed] in denying Petitioner access to Court by vehicle of habeas corpus?
The Defendant alleges that he was arrested illegally, that the trial court denied him counsel in violation of his constitutional rights, and that the trial court refused to hear a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. He seeks dismissal of his charges.
The pleading contains no documentation in support of the Defendant’s allegations.1 As such, the pleading is wholly insufficient for this court to engage in any review of the trial court’s actions. See Tenn. R. App. P. 10(c).