State vs. Mark Bryan
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9807-CC-00257
|
Jefferson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9901-CR-00044
|
Knox | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9901-CR-00121
|
Knox | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Stacy Allen Bullard
|
Bradley | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Pamela Hopper
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Vincent Sims
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Vincent Sims
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. James Hankins
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Kelly Haynes
|
Madison | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Tony Martin
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Jeffery Ray Jennings
|
Greene | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Darrell Baker
|
Hickman | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. James Matthew Lawrence
|
Wilson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Rudy Wendell Myers vs. State
|
Franklin | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9803-CR-00118
|
Hamilton | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
E1999-01465-CCA-R3CD
|
Blount | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Jerry Travis
|
Henry | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Kawaski Taylor
|
Gibson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Jeffrey Eugene Wright, a.k.a Jeffrey Eugene Arnell
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Henry DeQuan Rhodes
|
Wilson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
M1998-00118-CCA-R3-CD
|
Montgomery | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Khanh V. Le
The lead opinion of Judge Ogle, the separate concurring opinion of Judge Welles, and the separate opinion of Judge Woodall concurring in part and dissenting in part, filed in this case on March 6, 2000, are withdrawn. |
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Khanh V. Le
On November 10, 1997, the appellant, Khanh V. Le, was convicted by a jury in the Shelby County Criminal Court of first degree murder. The trial court sentenced the appellant to life imprisonment in the Tennessee Department of Correction. In this appeal as of right, the appellant presents the following issues for our review: (I) Whether the evidence is sufficient to sustain the appellant’s conviction of first degree murder; (II) Whether the trial court erred by refusing to charge any lesser included offenses to first degree murder; (III) Whether the trial court erred by denying the appellant’s motion to suppress identification testimony. Following a review of the record and the parties’ briefs, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. |
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Khanh V. Le - Concurring and Dissenting
I concur with Judge Ogle’s opinion concerning the issue of sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction for first degree murder and the issue regarding the suppression of identification testimony. I concur that the trial court did not err by refusing to charge voluntary manslaughter as a lesser-included offense. I also concur that the trial court erred by failing to charge second degree murder as a lesser-included offense. However, I dissent from the majority opinion’s conclusion that this error was not reversible error. |
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals |