01C01-9509-CC-00312
|
Cannon | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9502-CR-00056
|
Knox | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9510-CR-00315
|
Hamilton | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9510-CR-00331
|
Knox | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9510-CR-00331
|
Knox | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9511-CC-00346
|
Sullivan | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9511-CC-00375
|
Greene | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9508-CC-00212
|
Blount | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Antwain Spears
|
Carroll | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
01C01-9506-CC-00209
|
Rutherford | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
01C01-9507-CC-00235
|
Montgomery | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Cyril v. Fraser
|
Hickman | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
01C01-9511-PB-00380
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
01C01-9512-CC-00412
|
Giles | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
01C01-9504-CR-00120
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
02C01-9509-CR-00255
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
02C01-9510-CR-00322
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee vs. Hans Vincent Morris
The State has appealed from a ruling of the Criminal Court of Anderson County in which the trial court ruled that the Juvenile Court of Anderson County did not have jurisdiction to require a juvenile traffic offender to attend psychological counseling. |
Anderson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Gary Harris
A jury found Gary Harris guilty of manufacturing marijuana in violation of Tennessee Code Annotated 39-17-417. Harris appeals and presents the following issues for our review: I. Whether the evidence is sufficient to sustain the conviction; and We affirm. |
Grainger | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Alfred B. Rollins, et al. - Concurring
I concur in the result reached in the majority opinion. I write separately, though, to express my strong belief that the appellant’s conduct in this case is free of any blame, given the context of the question in issue. In this respect, whether I or anyone else would have found a more circumspect way to prove the point or make a record is largely irrelevant. Likewise, whether all the evidence -- viewed in hindsight -- actually proved the points sought to be proved relative to the appellant’s question is largely irrelevant. |
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9511-CR-00362
|
Hamilton | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9510-CC-00328
|
Blount | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
01C01-9403-CC-00083
|
Montgomery | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
02C01-9503-CC-00068
|
Hardeman | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
02C01-9507-CR-00191
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals |