State of Tennessee v. Carolyn L. Curry - Dissenting

Case Number
02S01-9709-CC-00079

I disagree with the majority's holding in this case that the district attorney
general abused his discretion in denying pretrial diversion. The defendant has
committed an extremely serious offense in this case. She has admitted to
embezzling approximately $27,400.00 from her employer. Her crime was not an
isolated incident but a complicated, calculated, and deliberate criminal scheme
that occurred repeatedly over a course of two years until she was ultimately
caught.

Authoring Judge
Justice Janice M. Holder
Case Name
State of Tennessee v. Carolyn L. Curry - Dissenting
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
This is a dissenting opinion
Download PDF Version
currycar.pdf36.79 KB