Estate of Martha S. French v. Stratford House et al. - Dissenting

Case Number
E2008-00539-SC-R11-CV

This appeal involves important questions regarding the process for adjudicating the liability of nursing homes for injuries to their residents. In particular, it requires this Court to articulate the principles that should be used to decide whether a claim based in part on the conduct of a certified nursing assistant (“CNA”) should be treated as a medical malpractice claim or as an  ordinary negligence claim. The Court has determined that claims involving the adequacy of CNAs’ training, the sufficiency of the staffing at a particular nursing home, and the adherence of CNAs to a patient’s plan of care are ordinary negligence claims that can be substantiated without the introduction of expert proof. The Court has also decided that the negligence per se doctrine permits the use of federal and state regulations regarding the licensing of nursing homes to create and define the scope of the duty of care that nursing homes owe to their patients. I cannot concur with either decision.

Authoring Judge
Justice William C. Koch, Jr.
Originating Judge
Judge L. Marie Williams
Case Name
Estate of Martha S. French v. Stratford House et al. - Dissenting
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
This is a dissenting opinion