Judy Gay Todd v. Continental Casualty Company

The trial court determined that the plaintiff suffered a 69% vocational impairment to the body as a whole. The defendant insurer asserts that: 1) that the plaintiff had a meaningful return to work and that the 2.5 times caps should apply; and 2) that if the caps do not apply, the award was excessive and not supported by the evidence. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the judgement of the trial court.