Kathryn A. Duke v. Harold W. Duke, III - Concur/Dissent

Case Number
M2012-01964-COA-10B-CV

I agree with the majority’s affirmance of the trial court’s denial of Father’s recusal motion. However, I would have held that the grounds previously raised by Father two years earlier were not subject to our review under Tenn. Sup. Ct. R. 10B and, therefore, would have dismissed that part of the appeal. I would affirm denial as to the new grounds upon the reasoning set out in the majority opinion.

Authoring Judge
Presiding Judge Patricia J. Cottrell
Originating Judge
Judge James G. Martin, III
Case Name
Kathryn A. Duke v. Harold W. Duke, III - Concur/Dissent
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
No
Download PDF Version