Case Number
M2011-02525-COA-R3-CV
Defendant/Appellant was arrested and charged with driving under the influence and violation of the implied consent law. At trial, Appellant and the arresting officer gave conflicting testimony as to whether Appellant refused to submit to a blood test. The jury acquitted Appellant of the driving under the influence charge, but the trial court, crediting the arresting officer’s testimony, found that the Appellant had violated the implied consent law. On appeal, Appellant argues that the trial court erred in crediting the testimony of the arresting officer despite the acquittal by the jury. Discerning no error, we affirm.
Originating Judge
Judge Dee David Gay
Case Name
State of Tennessee v. Antonio Freeman
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
No
Download PDF Version
freemanaopn.pdf162.97 KB