Case Number
W2012-00960-CCA-R3-PC
I concur with the majority opinion save one point. My colleagues infer that the post-conviction court discredited the Petitioner’s testimony, although the court made no such finding. I believe the record reflects that the court’s findings accepted all the testimony as true but that the court concluded the Petitioner did not provide clear and convincing evidence of his claim. The record supports such a conclusion.
Originating Judge
Judge Donald E. Parish
Case Name
Bobby Glen Crocker v. State of Tennessee - Concurring
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
No
Download PDF Version
crockerbobbyglencon.pdf37.9 KB