State of Tennessee v. Robert Joseph Harr - Concurring/Dissenting

Case Number
W2011-02735-CCA-R3-CD

I concur with the majority opinion, except I respectfully disagree with its affirming the imposition of forty-five days’ confinement. I do not believe the trial court justified confinement as opposed to full probation under the circumstances in this case. My view results from the trial court’s findings and the law that guides its determinations.

Authoring Judge
Presiding Judge Joseph M. Tipton
Originating Judge
Judge Donald E. Parish
Case Name
State of Tennessee v. Robert Joseph Harr - Concurring/Dissenting
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
This is a dissenting opinion
Download PDF Version