State of Tennessee v. James Allen Bailey - Dissenting

Case Number
E2001-02443-CCA-R3-CD
Based on my de novo review of the record in this case, I am unable to agree that the imposition of consecutive sentences is warranted. Therefore I respectfully dissent from that portion of the opinion which concludes that two of the Defendant’s sentences should be served consecutively.
Authoring Judge
Judge David H. Welles
Originating Judge
Judge Ben W. Hooper, II
Case Name
State of Tennessee v. James Allen Bailey - Dissenting
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
This is a dissenting opinion
Download PDF Version