Gregory Fodness v. Newport and Cocke County Economic Development Commission, Inc. - Dissenting

Case Number
E2004-01491-COA-R3-CV

I agree with the majority’s conclusion that the Commission is not entitled to summary judgment on the record presently before us. I disagree, however, with the majority’s rationale for that conclusion. Specifically, I disagree with the assertion that the public’s access to the Commission’s records depends upon whether, in the words of the majority, “[the Commission] is the functional equivalent of a governmental agency.” I believe this concept of “functional equivalen[cy],” as promulgated by the Supreme Court in Memphis Publ’g Co. v. Cherokee Children & Family Servs., Inc., 87 S.W.3d 67, 79 (Tenn. 2002), is not material to the issue now before us.

Authoring Judge
Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Originating Judge
Chancellor Telford E. Forgerty, Jr.
Case Name
Gregory Fodness v. Newport and Cocke County Economic Development Commission, Inc. - Dissenting
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
This is a dissenting opinion
Download PDF Version
FodnessD.pdf13.25 KB