Case Number
M2002-02010-SC-WCM-CV
We granted review in this case to consider whether an employee is barred from seeking workers’ compensation benefits in Tennessee because the employee made a binding election of remedies by pursuing benefits for the same injury in another state. We hold that the employee’s filing of a claim in South Carolina, his request for a hearing there, and the taking of depositions in that matter constitute affirmative acts to obtain benefits in another state sufficient to constitute a binding election of remedies that bars the employee’s Tennessee claim. Therefore, we reject the conclusion of the Special Workers’ Compensation Appeals Panel on this issue and affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Originating Judge
Judge R.E. Lee Davies
Case Name
Christopher A. Eadie v. Complete Co., Inc.et al.
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
This is a dissenting opinion
Download PDF Version
EadieCA.pdf20.61 KB