James Stephenson v. The Third Company - Dissenting

Case Number
M2002-02082-COA-R3-CV

I agree on both counts. The “loan agreements” are poorly drafted, and they do not reflect
sound business judgment on Mr. Caldwell’s part. So what? When competent parties have bargained in good faith and have entered into a written contract, it is not the courts’ prerogative to rewrite the contract or to relieve either party from the burdensome effects of their agreement. Vargo v. Lincoln Brass Works, Inc., 115 S.W.3d 487, 492 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003). Whether considered by themselves or in conjunction with the parties’ separate “consulting agreements,” the fact of the matter is that Mr. Caldwell’s “loan agreements” are precisely that – loan agreements. I would affirm the trial court.

Authoring Judge
Presiding Judge William C. Koch, Jr.
Originating Judge
Judge Ross H. Hicks
Case Name
James Stephenson v. The Third Company - Dissenting
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
This is a dissenting opinion
Download PDF Version
StephJWD.pdf39.57 KB