Steven Griffin v. State of Tennessee - Dissenting

Case Number
M2003-00557-CCA-R3-PC

I respectfully disagree with the conclusion reached in the majority opinion. The Post- Conviction DNA Analysis Act has no provision that even hints of waiver relative to a request to test evidence for the first time. The applicable requirement for consideration is T.C.A. § 40-30-304(3) which states: “The evidence was never previously subjected to DNA analysis or was not subjected to the analysis that is now requested which could resolve an issue not resolved by previous analysis.” The focus is on the fact that no test occurred, not on whether a previous opportunity existed or was pursued to have the test done.

Authoring Judge
Judge Joseph M. Tipton
Originating Judge
Judge Steve R. Dozier
Case Name
Steven Griffin v. State of Tennessee - Dissenting
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
This is a dissenting opinion
Download PDF Version