Case Number
M2003-00588-CCA-R9-CO
This interlocutory appeal, brought by the State, seeks to answer whether a defendant’s statements made during the third phase of a polygraph examination are admissible evidence. We conclude the trial court correctly suppressed the defendant’s statements because the “post-instrument phase” of the polygraph examination was an integral part of the examination process and not a separate and discrete event. We affirm the judgment from the trial court.
Originating Judge
Judge John W. Rollins
Case Name
State of Tennessee v. Benjamin Damron
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
This is a dissenting opinion
Download PDF Version
Damron.pdf20.51 KB