State vs. Kermit Maurice Cozart

Case Number
W1999-00022-SC-R11-CD
We granted review of this case to decide whether a trial court must instruct the jury based upon this Court's holding in State v. Anthony, 817 S.W.2d 299 (Tenn. 1991). We hold that the trial court properly declined to instruct the jury that it should determine whether the confinement, movement, or detention inherent in the kidnapping was essentially incidental to the accompanying robbery. Applying the principles first enunciated in Anthony, we further hold that the dual convictions for aggravated robbery and aggravated kidnapping in this case do not violate due process. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals.
Authoring Judge
Justice Janice M. Holder
Originating Judge
Julian P. Guinn
Case Name
State vs. Kermit Maurice Cozart
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
No
Download PDF Version
cozartkm.pdf40.53 KB