Case Number
E2014-02169-CCA-R3-CD
Defendant, Elashanti Dean, pled guilty to five counts of aggravated robbery in 1998. He filed a motion under Tennessee Rule of Criminal Procedure 36.1, alleging that his concurrent sentences were illegal because he was released on bond in one case at the time he committed the crimes in four other cases. The trial court summarily dismissed the motion. Upon our thorough review of the record, we determine that Defendant has not presented a colorable claim for relief because the judgments are silent as to whether his sentences were to run concurrently or consecutively. Therefore, we affirm the decision of the trial court.
Originating Judge
Judge Barry A. Steelman
Case Name
State of Tennessee v. Elashanti Dean
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
No
Download PDF Version
deanelashantiopn.pdf104.88 KB