In this probate action, the executrix proposed to distribute the decedent’s real and personal property in a manner that she claimed was in accordance with the decedent’s Last Will and Testament (“Will”). One beneficiary, one of the decedent’s three adult children, objected, claiming that the decedent had granted her an option to purchase one parcel of real property owned by the decedent. The trial court determined that the real property in question was an asset of the probate estate and that the executrix could administer it in accordance with the decedent’s Will. The trial court also determined that a settlement agreement executed by the decedent’s three children precluded the claim of an option to purchase. The beneficiary appealed. Discerning no reversible error, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Case Number
E2014-02204-COA-R3-CV
Originating Judge
Chancellor Telford E. Forgety, Jr.
Case Name
In re Estate of Tandy Nathan Dalton
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
No
Download PDF Version
dalton.opn_.final2_corrected.pdf195.52 KB