Hyundai Motor America v. Tennessee Motor Vehicle Commission, et al.

Case Number
M2015-01411-COA-R3-CV

This appeal arises from a proceeding initiated by two automobile dealers who challenged the location of a proposed dealership in a contested case proceeding before the Tennessee Motor Vehicle Commission (the “Commission”); the manufacturer contended that the dealers were not located in the “relevant market area,” as required by statute and moved to dismiss the proceeding for lack of standing.  The administrative law judge overruled the manufacturer’s motion, and the manufacturer filed a petition in Chancery Court seeking interlocutory review.  The trial court dismissed the petition, holding that the court lacked jurisdiction to review the administrative judge’s ruling on the motion.  The motor vehicle manufacturer appeals the dismissal of its petition for judicial review of the denial of its motion to dismiss the contested case proceeding. Concluding that the manufacturer did not meet the threshold requirement for immediate judicial review as set forth in the Administrative Procedures Act, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Authoring Judge
Judge Richard H. Dinkins
Originating Judge
Chancellor Ellen H. Lyle
Case Name
Hyundai Motor America v. Tennessee Motor Vehicle Commission, et al.
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
No
Download PDF Version