Nancy Maureen Jarman v. Franklin N. Jarman - Concurring in Part and Dissenting in Part

Case Number
M2017-01730-COA-R3-CV

I concur in the conclusion that the Circuit Court for Davidson County correctly denied the petition of Ms. Nancy Maureen Jarman to increase her alimony.  But I respectfully dissent from the affirmance of the award of attorney’s fees to Ms. Jarman.  I share the view of Franklin N. Jarman that the trial court lacked the authority to award attorney’s fees in this instance.

Authoring Judge
Judge W. Neal McBrayer
Originating Judge
Judge Philip E. Smith
Case Name
Nancy Maureen Jarman v. Franklin N. Jarman - Concurring in Part and Dissenting in Part
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
No
Download PDF Version