Randall D. Kiser v. Ian J. Wolfe, et al. - Concurring/Dissenting

Case Number
E2009-01529-SC-R11-CV

I concur with the majority’s conclusion that our review should include all three pages of the insurance application appended to the summary judgment motion. I, however, would construe Tennessee Code Annotated section 56-7-1201 (2008) to require more than merely the insured’s signature at the end of an application for insurance in order for the insured to effectively reject “in writing” the amount of uninsured motorist (“UM”) coverage otherwise mandated by the statute.

Authoring Judge
Justice Sharon G. Lee
Originating Judge
Judge Lawrence Howard Puckett
Case Name
Randall D. Kiser v. Ian J. Wolfe, et al. - Concurring/Dissenting
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
This is a dissenting opinion
Download PDF Version