A husband and wife sought to end their long-term marriage. After a prolonged trial, the court classified, valued, and equitably divided the marital estate. The court also ordered both parties to pay their own attorney’s fees. The wife filed a motion to alter or amend the final decree. Acknowledging errors in the initial decree, the court issued an amended divorce decree. Among other things, the court amended the value of the marital residence. Both parties raise issues on appeal. We find the evidence does not preponderate against the court’s classification of the husband’s interest in several parcels of real property as marital property. We also conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion in amending the value of the marital residence, dividing the marital estate, or declining to award attorney’s fees to the wife. So we affirm.
Case Number
M2019-01834-COA-R3-CV
Originating Judge
Judge A. Ensley Hagan, Jr.
Case Name
Bobby Scott Smith v. Barbara Diane (Fuston) Smith
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
No
Download PDF Version
smith.bobby_.opn_.pdf144.28 KB