Beverly Gardner v. Saint Thomas Midtown Hospital (Concur)

Case Number
M2019-02237-SC-R11-CV

This case presents a simple issue: Whether the Tennessee Health Care Liability
Act’s statute of limitation extension prevails over the common law rule that a plaintiff
cannot pursue a vicarious liability claim against a principal when the plaintiff’s claim
against the agent is procedurally barred by operation of law before the plaintiff asserts the
vicarious liability claim against the principal. This common law rule is known as the
operation-of-law exception. Here, the Plaintiff filed a vicarious liability suit against the
principal, Saint Thomas Midtown Hospital, after the one-year statute of limitations had
expired as to the Hospital’s agents but within the Act’s 120-day extension of the statute of
limitations as to the Hospital. Was the suit timely filed? Yes—the Act’s provisions prevail
over the common law operation-of-law exception.

Authoring Judge
Justice Sharon G. Lee
Originating Judge
Judge Joseph P. Binkley, Jr.
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
This is a concurring opinion