Erika Jean Schanzenbach v. Rowan Skeen

Case Number
E2023-00458-COA-R3-CV

THOMAS R. FRIERSON, II, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part.
I respectfully dissent from the majority’s determination that this action has been “rendered moot” by the closure of the Bristol Regional Women’s Center in Bristol, Tennessee (“the Clinic”). Regarding the remaining issues on appeal, I concur with the majority’s holding that Petitioner Schanzenbach did not present sufficient evidence of stalking and that the trial court’s denial of her petition for order of protection should therefore be affirmed. I also agree with the majority’s decision not to award damages to the respondent, Rowan Skeen, in the form of attorney’s fees.

Authoring Judge
Judge John McClarty
Originating Judge
Judge William K. Rogers
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
This is a concurring opinion
Download PDF Version