Ford vs. Ford
01A01-9611-CV-00536
Trial Court Judge: Muriel Robinson

Davidson Court of Appeals

Holifield vs. Campbell
01A01-9806-CH-00291
Trial Court Judge: Ellen Hobbs Lyle

Davidson Court of Appeals

State vs. Harold Shaw
01C01-9707-CR-00259
Trial Court Judge: Seth W. Norman

Davidson Court of Criminal Appeals

State vs. Lisa Murphy
01C01-9708-CR-00355
Trial Court Judge: J. O. Bond

Wilson Court of Criminal Appeals

Ronald Thomas vs. State
01C01-9709-CR-00407
Trial Court Judge: Seth W. Norman

Davidson Court of Criminal Appeals

State vs. Timothy Henderson
01C01-9801-CC-00001

Marshall Court of Criminal Appeals

The Sherwin Williams Company, v. Ruth E. Johnson, Commissioner of Revenue, State of Tennessee
01A01-9711-CH-00651
Authoring Judge: Judge William B. Cain
Trial Court Judge: Chancellor Irvin H. Kilcrease, Jr.

Plaintiff Sherwin-Williams Company, filed suit pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated Section 67-1-1802 seeking a refund of corporate excise taxes with respect to tax years 1987, 1989, and 1990. The appeal presents three questions, to wit:

 

Davidson Court of Appeals

Lynn vs. Blue
01A01-9712-CH-00704
Trial Court Judge: Allen W. Wallace

Humphreys Court of Appeals

Beal vs. Sloan
01A01-9801-CV-00024
Trial Court Judge: Barbara N. Haynes

Davidson Court of Appeals

Frederick B. Ingram v. William F. Earthman
01A01-9510-CH-00439
Authoring Judge: Judge William C. Koch, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: Chancellor Robert S. Brandt

This appeal involves a dispute between two former friends and business associates over a sizeable personal debt. After one of the friends failed to repay a $1,700,000 loan, the friend who had loaned the money filed suit in the Chancery Court for Davidson County seeking to recover the loan and interest. The borrower asserted that the lender had delayed too long in filing suit and counterclaimed for allegedly unpaid compensation and retirement benefits. A jury awarded the lender $5,667,122.84 on the debt, and the trial court, with the parties’ consent, awarded the lender an additional $400,000 for his legal expenses. On this appeal, the borrower raises numerous issues relating to the denial of his motions for directed verdict, the adequacy of the jury instructions, the instructions limiting the use of the evidence of the lender’s prior criminal conviction, and the excessiveness of the verdict. We have determined that the judgment should be affirmed.

Davidson Court of Appeals

State vs. Paul Epps
02C01-9712-CC-00487
Trial Court Judge: Jon Kerry Blackwood

Fayette Court of Criminal Appeals

State vs. Wanda Harris
02C01-9803-CC-00087
Trial Court Judge: William B. Acree

Obion Court of Criminal Appeals

State vs. Mickey White
02C01-9804-CC-00103
Trial Court Judge: Jon Kerry Blackwood

McNairy Court of Criminal Appeals

Mierzejewski vs. BS
03A01-9802-CH-00044

Hamilton Court of Appeals

State vs. William Murphy
02C01-9712-CC-00473
Trial Court Judge: John Franklin Murchison

Madison Court of Criminal Appeals

State vs. Tony Fitz
02C01-9712-CC-00486
Trial Court Judge: Joseph H. Walker, III

Tipton Court of Criminal Appeals

02C01-9805-CC-00153Cecil
02C01-9805-CC-00153Cecil
Trial Court Judge: R. Lee Moore Jr.

Lake Court of Criminal Appeals

State vs. Williams
03S01-9706-CR-00060

Hamilton Supreme Court

01S01-9705-CH-00110
01S01-9705-CH-00110
Trial Court Judge: Robert S. Brandt

Supreme Court

State vs. Quintero and Hall
01S01-9703-CC-00068

Humphreys Supreme Court

01S01-9711-CH-00248
01S01-9711-CH-00248

Williamson Supreme Court

03S01-9706-CR-00068
03S01-9706-CR-00068

Supreme Court

State vs. Anthony Cole
02C01-9711-CC-00445
Trial Court Judge: Lee Moore

Dyer Court of Criminal Appeals

State vs. Shirley Double
01C01-9704-CR-00156

Overton Court of Criminal Appeals

State vs.Frank Hill
01C01-9708-CC-00344

Montgomery Court of Criminal Appeals