01A01-9701-CH-00035
|
Marshall | Court of Appeals | |
Barnett vs. Barnett
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Hammock vs. Sumner Co.
|
Sumner | Court of Appeals | |
Farmer vs. Dept. of Children Svcs.
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
State vs. Carla Smith
|
Montgomery | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Bragg vs. Metro Gov't.
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Williams vs. Comer
|
Sumner | Court of Appeals | |
Steiner vs. The Parman Corp.
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Turnbo vs. Turnbo
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Estis, et. al. vs. Kelley, et. al.
|
Maury | Court of Appeals | |
Turnbo vs. Turnbo
|
Wayne | Court of Appeals | |
Stewart vs. HCA Health Services
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
State vs. Boston
|
Sullivan | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Canada vs. Ace
|
Bradley | Court of Appeals | |
03A01-9707-DR-00266
|
Roane | Court of Appeals | |
State vs. Cleveland
|
Supreme Court | ||
Muse vs. State (CC)
|
Court of Appeals | ||
01S01-9611-CR-00227
|
Sumner | Supreme Court | |
Turner vs. Jordan, M.D.
|
Supreme Court | ||
State vs. Winningham
|
Pickett | Supreme Court | |
State vs. Vineyard
|
Supreme Court | ||
State of Tennessee v. William F. Carico
The application for permission to appeal from the convicition of aggravated rape and a Range I sentence of 25 years was granted in part, to consider two of the several issues decided by the Court of Criminal Appeals, which affirmed the conviction and the sentence. In those isues, the appellant insists that the delay in initiating the prosecution was a violation of his constitutional rights to a speedy trial and due process and that the sentence imnposed is excellive. The conviction and the sentence are affirmed. |
Supreme Court | ||
Gary/Kathryn Norman vs. Vicki/Ray Prather
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
State vs. Rondey Bond
|
Lake | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Larry Joyner
|
Lake | Court of Criminal Appeals |