Hensley vs. State
03C01-9703-CR-00106
Trial Court Judge: Lynn W. Brown

Elzey vs. State
03C01-9703-CR-00097
Trial Court Judge: Lynn W. Brown

Hutchison vs. State
03C01-9702-CR-00065
Trial Court Judge: James W Itt

Slater vs. State
03C01-9702-CR-00061
Trial Court Judge: Richard R. Baumgartner

Laura Muller vs. Evelyn Lannom
02A01-9702-CH-00043
Trial Court Judge: J. Steven Stafford

James Wallace, et ux vs. Bobby Hardin, et ux
02A01-9702-CH-00048
Trial Court Judge: George R. Ellis

02A01-9701-CV-00025
02A01-9701-CV-00025
Trial Court Judge: D'Army Bailey

Wayland vs. Peters
03A01-9705-CV-00172

State vs. Charles Fowler
01C01-9608-CC-00363

State vs. Mark Bateman
01C01-9608-CC-00377
Trial Court Judge: Cornelia A. Clark

State vs. Robert Booher
01C01-9612-CC-00525
Trial Court Judge: Robert E. Burch

Birdwell vs. McKinney, et. ux.
01A01-9701-CV-00023
Trial Court Judge: James E. Walton

State vs. Jeffrey Schmidt
01C01-9701-CC-00027

In re: The Conservatorship of Matthew Hurline
01A01-9703-PB-00135
Trial Court Judge: Tom E. Gray

Brian David McCray, v. Irene Carol Klanseck McCray
01A01-9704-CH-00170
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Henry F. Todd
Trial Court Judge: Judge Jim T. Hamilton

This appeal seeks review of a post-divorce decree judgment entered by the Trial Court on December 6, 1996, finding the husband guilty of contempt, adjusting alimony and child support, determining the amount of unpaid arrearage of each, ordering monthly payments of the adjudicated arrearage and committing the husband to jail upon failure to pay any monthly installment required by the order. On August 1, 1997, this Court filed an opinion disposing of a previous appeal from an order entered by the Trial Court December 22, 1995. No application was filed for permission to appeal to the Supreme Court, and mandate was issued to the Trial Court. The August 1, 1997 judgment of this Court is now final.

City of Murfreesboro vs. Worthington
01A01-9703-CV-00124
Trial Court Judge: Robert E. Corlew, III

01A01-9612-CV-00570
01A01-9612-CV-00570
Trial Court Judge: Tom E. Gray

Glenn Hallock vs. State
01C01-9704-CR-00121
Trial Court Judge: J. O. Bond

Donnie Carpenter vs. State
01C01-9703-CC-00114

McCray vs. McCray
01A01-9704-CH-00170
Trial Court Judge: Jim T. Hamilton

X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
Trial Court Judge: Thomas H. Shriver

State vs. Gunter
03C01-9605-CC-00183

Buckner vs. State
03C01-9703-CC-00116

Craig Ring v. Ckr Industries, Inc., et al.
01S01-9702-CV-00031
Authoring Judge: William S. Russell, Retired Judge
Trial Court Judge: Hon. J. Curtis Smith,
This Workers' Compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with Tennessee Code Annotated _5-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting to the Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The defendants, CKR Industries, Inc. and The Yasuda Fire & Marine Insurance Company of America, appeal the judgment of the trial court in finding the plaintiff, Craig Ring, sustained a compensable work-related injury and awarding permanent partial disability of twenty-five percent (25%) to the left arm. For the reasons stated in this opinion, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. The plaintiff, Craig Ring, was 26 years of age at the time of this trial. He has a GED, no specialized job training, and a prior history of factory production work. Plaintiff worked for defendant, CKR Industries for 4 years prior to Au gust 3, 1994 , when he reported an injury to his left index finger and arm. He operated a press or machine at that time which required repetitive movement of both arms. Dr. Mary Ellen Clinton, a board certified neurologist, examined and treated plaintiff after he had been seen and referred by numerous doctors. She gave various possible causes of plaintiff's problem, but stated his condition was not work-related. Plaintiff was seen by Dr. Richard Fishbein, a board certified orthopedic surgeon, for the purpose of an ind ependent me dical evaluation. Dr. Fishbein was of the opinion the plaintiff's condition was ulnar neuropathy caused by his repetitive work. He assessed a permanent partial impairment of fifteen percent (15%) to the left upper extremity and assigned work restrictions of no lifting of more than 2 pounds on a regular basis and n o more than 5 pounds on a very infrequent basis. Plaintiff testified he really did not know how or when he hurt his finger and arm, but they first became painful at wo rk on Augus t 3, 1994. At trial, he comp lained of constant pain in his left elbow and numbness in the tip of his left index finger. Because of his work restrictions, he has been transferred to a lighter job at less pay. Plaintiff has taken up go lf, built a deck on his house, and raced four wheelers since August, 1994. At trial, the parties stipulated the date of the injury, notice, all medical bills and temporary total disability payments had been paid, and the appropriate weekly compensation 2

Wallace Palmore v. Frito-Lay, Inc., et al.
01S01-9610-CV-00204
Authoring Judge: William S. Russell, Retired Judge
Trial Court Judge: Hon.