I agree fully with the majority’s resolution of this case and the issues raised therein. I write separately, however, to express my concern with the apparent inconsistency in the grounds alleged by the Department. Specifically, while the parents’ failure to make reasonable efforts to provide a suitable home for the first four months after removal of the child from the home is a definition of abandonment, Tenn. Code Ann. § 36-1-102(1)(A), it is questionable to me whether the Department can rely on that ground when it has entered into a permanency plan that gives a parent one year to find stable and suitable housing. The majority found that ground unavailable because the Department did not use reasonable efforts, making it unnecessary to address my concern. I agree with that conclusion, but want to make it clear that some question about reliance on that ground may exist regardless of the Department’s efforts.
Case Number
M2004-02377-COA-R3-PT
Originating Judge
Judge Samuel E. Benningfield
Case Name
In Re M.J.M., Jr., L.P.M., & C.A.O.M. - Concurring
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
No
Download PDF Version
MJMcon.pdf7 KB