G. Winston Gragg vs. Nellie Gragg
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Roger Brown vs. City of Memphis
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Young vs. Young
|
Coffee | Court of Appeals | |
Ford vs. Ford
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Holifield vs. Campbell
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
The Sherwin Williams Company, v. Ruth E. Johnson, Commissioner of Revenue, State of Tennessee
Plaintiff Sherwin-Williams Company, filed suit pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated Section 67-1-1802 seeking a refund of corporate excise taxes with respect to tax years 1987, 1989, and 1990. The appeal presents three questions, to wit:
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Lynn vs. Blue
|
Humphreys | Court of Appeals | |
Beal vs. Sloan
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Frederick B. Ingram v. William F. Earthman
This appeal involves a dispute between two former friends and business associates over a sizeable personal debt. After one of the friends failed to repay a $1,700,000 loan, the friend who had loaned the money filed suit in the Chancery Court for Davidson County seeking to recover the loan and interest. The borrower asserted that the lender had delayed too long in filing suit and counterclaimed for allegedly unpaid compensation and retirement benefits. A jury awarded the lender $5,667,122.84 on the debt, and the trial court, with the parties’ consent, awarded the lender an additional $400,000 for his legal expenses. On this appeal, the borrower raises numerous issues relating to the denial of his motions for directed verdict, the adequacy of the jury instructions, the instructions limiting the use of the evidence of the lender’s prior criminal conviction, and the excessiveness of the verdict. We have determined that the judgment should be affirmed. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Mierzejewski vs. BS
|
Hamilton | Court of Appeals | |
Rowana/Kevin Bobo vs. Leanther Willett
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Poole vs. State
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Stancliff vs. Stancliff
|
Court of Appeals | ||
On the Matter of James Lee Adams et al
|
Cheatham | Court of Appeals | |
Susan Manquella Adams v.Earnie Bryan Adams
Susan Manquella Adams, hereafter referred to as the wife, has appealed from the judgment of the Trial Court declaring her and her husband, Earnie Bryan Adams, to be divorced, awarding joint custody of two children with alternating physical custody in each parent, and providing for child support and other incidentals |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Irwin vs. Irwin
|
Rutherford | Court of Appeals | |
Fox vs. City of Dover
|
Stewart | Court of Appeals | |
Rayburn vs. Rayburn
|
Cheatham | Court of Appeals | |
Lifetime Books vs. Thomas Nelson
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
02A01-9705-CV-00103
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Joel Summers vs. Lisa Summers
|
Carroll | Court of Appeals | |
Lucy L. Bond v. Belle Meade Fund Partners v. Belle Meade Fund Partners, Branch Property L.P., Branch Property, Ltd. Partnership
The plaintiff sued for injury suffered when she stepped into a hole in the asphalt surface of a parking lot provided for customers of Kroger Company. Kroger was dismissed by nonsuit, and the remaining defendants were dismissed by summary judgment. Plaintiff appealed and presented the following issue: I. Whether a genuine issue of material fact has been raised by the plaintiff/appellant, so as to warrant this cause to be tried on its merits. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Logan vs. Logan
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Logan vs. Logan
|
Coffee | Court of Appeals | |
Williams vs. Williams
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals |